I'm Nick Tommarello. I build human-gated workflow systems for recurring intake, routing, reporting, document, and inbox work. Agents, workflows, skills, and data handle the repetition. People keep the judgment.
I come from tech, where I built revenue and operating systems for other companies before building one of my own. Today I run a media and creative agency that publishes content, runs live social broadcasts, and supports a community. Human-gated workflows support that operation every day.
One workflow prepares the day-start rundown: what happened overnight, the day’s tasks and meetings, client calls summarized, and the news breaking in the space. Another turns raw footage into transcripts, summaries, and clip candidates for a human pick. Others support community moderation, live-broadcast control, and machine monitoring. Each has a defined job and routes exceptions to me. I now build the same operating pattern for client portals and back-office workflows.
The agency made the operating problem concrete: recurring work moves through too few people when rules, state, and exceptions live across several systems. Sudobid maps that work, puts repetition into a controlled workflow, and keeps consequential decisions with people.
Every engagement runs the same loop. You watch it happen and you own what comes out.
Find the drag. The one recurring workflow costing the most time or revenue.
Map it as it really runs. Inputs, steps, decision points, where it stalls.
Separate judgment from repetition. The machine does the repetition. You keep the judgment.
Build the AI-assisted version with a human approval gate on anything that reaches a customer.
Document and hand off, so your team runs it, not me.
Measure. Hours saved or revenue moved, in real arithmetic. If it did not move a number, I say so.
This fits companies from roughly 10 to 500 people. Size is only a rough filter. The stronger signal is that sales, ops, or reporting still moves by hand between systems, and a few people have become the bottleneck the whole company routes through.
A good fit has real process examples, an accountable owner, enough volume to matter, and a team that keeps final judgment. If you would rather build it yourself, the report gives you the plan.
These are examples of fit, not a client roster. The common thread is routine work that follows a pattern but still gets pushed through a person.
The mini assessment is free and written. It says when your team can handle the next step without me.