The front door is a free written assessment. No calls, ever.Get yours →
Workflow products · Case routing

Every case has a state, an owner, and a next action

The orchestrator reads a defined trigger, validates the case state, prepares the next route, and records what a person approves. It gives unclear work a visible exception path instead of letting it disappear into chat or memory.

Entry problem

Status lives in too many places

A client request, shipment exception, production task, or account issue changes hands several times. Email says one thing, the tracker says another, and the next owner learns about it only after someone asks. The operating cost sits in the chasing, duplicate updates, and missed transitions.

This workflow fits case-based work with a definable lifecycle: professional-services matters, logistics exceptions, B2B service delivery, ecommerce operations, SaaS account work, and media production. It needs a stable source of truth and clear transition rules. If nobody agrees what each state means, that definition work comes first.

How it works

State moves only after the checks pass

Trigger

State changes

A new case, event, message, date, or system change starts the path.

Validation

Check current state

Required fields, prior state, ownership, and transition rules are verified.

Route or draft

Prepare the handoff

The next owner, task, status note, and supporting context are assembled.

Human approval

Approve consequential moves

A person decides exceptions, commitments, external messages, and risky transitions.

System update

Write one state

The approved state, owner, reason, and next action are recorded together.

Exception

Hold invalid paths

Conflicting state, missing data, and unsupported transitions stop with context.

What stays humanYour judgment
Commitments

People approve promises, scope changes, financial decisions, and customer-facing updates.

Exceptions

A person resolves conflicting information, unusual cases, and rule overrides.

State model

Your team owns the meaning of each state, transition, role, and closed condition.

What I need from youClient inputs
Map

Current states, valid transitions, owners, dependencies, and common failure paths.

Evidence

Representative cases, status histories, handoff messages, and exception examples.

Access

The systems that create events and store state, plus one client-side owner.

Proof requirement

The state history has to support the claim

This page does not claim a client result. Proof requires the same case definitions before and after, enough history to observe normal and unusual work, and a record of every human override.

What would count as proofMeasured operating record
Flow

Cases per state, handoff count, wait between states, and time spent chasing status.

Quality

Wrong routes, invalid transitions, missing owners, reopened cases, and duplicate updates.

Control

Approvals, overrides, exceptions, and unsupported transitions with reasons attached.

Scenario math

A written planning scenario

These assumptions illustrate the arithmetic. They are not a client result or a delivery promise.

Assumptions

400 cases move each month. Triage, handoff, and status entry consume nine minutes per case. Seventy-five percent follow a stable path that could remove six of those minutes.

Arithmetic

400 × 9 minutes = 60 current hours. 400 × 75% × 6 minutes = 1,800 minutes, or 30 hours of modeled monthly capacity.

Meaning

The scenario keeps exceptions and consequential moves with people. Actual value depends on case mix, data quality, adoption, operating cost, and what the team does with the capacity.

Put the current states on the page.

The assessment starts with one case type, its owners, and the transition that causes the most chasing.

Map the routing problem